Ethiopia summoned Sudan’s ambassador after threatening remarks by Sudan’s Acting Foreign Minister regarding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Ethiopia emphasized strong bilateral relations despite concerns and affirmed its commitment to resolving disputes through dialogue, highlighting the dam’s potential for economic growth and rejecting foreign interference.
On November 14, 2024, Ethiopia summoned Sudan’s ambassador, Al-Zein Ibrahim, in reaction to remarks made by Sudan’s Acting Foreign Minister, Ali Youssif, which hinted at potential conflict over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). In a television appearance, Youssif indicated that Sudan might align with Egypt if discussions regarding the dam’s operations fail. He stated that the possibility of war could not be ruled out unless an agreement that safeguards the water rights of all three countries—Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt—is established. Ethiopia’s foreign ministry expressed its concerns to Ambassador Ibrahim, highlighting its desire to maintain strong bilateral relations. Despite the tensions, spokesperson Nebiat Getachew portrayed the relationship with Sudan as “developed and strategic,” suggesting that Youssif’s comments be viewed as exaggerated social media commentary. He reiterated Ethiopia’s commitment to resolving the dam dispute through dialogue and remarked that Sudan had not suffered detriment during the dam’s filling, drawing on the previous 13 years of operational experience. Furthermore, he emphasized the potential for the GERD to foster economic integration in the region and reaffirmed Ethiopia’s stance against foreign interference in Sudan’s affairs. The recent ratification of the Nile Basin Agreement by South Sudan has been welcomed as an opportunity for the launch of donor-funded development initiatives. Additionally, Ethiopia has expressed ongoing support for Somalia’s stability and its campaign against the al Shabaab militant group.
The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) has been a focal point of contention between Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt. The dam, which Ethiopia claims will greatly enhance its power generation capabilities, has been a source of dispute regarding water rights and management of the Nile River. The comments from Sudan’s foreign minister reflect the rising tensions and the historical complexities surrounding water usage and territorial claims among the three countries. The dam’s operation has previously led to strained relations, making diplomatic engagement crucial in seeking solutions to shared water challenges.
In summary, the diplomatic dispute sparked by Sudanese remarks highlights the fragility of relations between Ethiopia and Sudan regarding the GERD. Ethiopia’s emphasis on dialogue aims to mitigate feelings of hostility arising from the ongoing discussions. By showcasing its commitment to peaceful resolutions and regional development projects, Ethiopia seeks to stabilize relations while effectively handling the complexities arising from GERD negotiations. It remains imperative for all parties to engage constructively to ensure a peaceful and mutually beneficial outcome.
Original Source: sudantribune.com
