The Sudanese military has rejected UAE accusations of an airstrike on its ambassador’s residence, blaming the Rapid Support Forces instead. The UAE condemned the alleged attack, calling it a violation of diplomatic premises. This incident is a part of the ongoing conflict in Sudan, highlighting tensions between various factions and the implications for international diplomatic relations.
The Sudanese armed forces have categorically denied accusations from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) regarding an alleged aerial attack on the UAE ambassador’s residence in Khartoum. The Sudanese military has instead attributed the assault to the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). This incursion has emerged amid a concerning escalation of violence in the capital, where clashes have intensified over the past four days. The UAE had condemned what it termed a “heinous attack” conducted by a Sudanese military aircraft, asserting that the offensive caused significant damage to the diplomatic premises. In light of these events, Sudan’s foreign ministry rebuked the UAE’s charges as “false allegations” and labeled the actions of the RSF as “shameful and cowardly.” The Sudanese army has a history of accusing the UAE of supplying arms to the RSF during the ongoing conflict that has persisted for 17 months. These allegations are bolstered by reports from United Nations sanctions monitors who have characterized such claims as credible. Nonetheless, the UAE denies any involvement or support in the war, yet it has acknowledged casualties resulting from the purported attack on its diplomatic site, calling upon the Sudanese army to take full responsibility for what it described as a “flagrant violation of the fundamental principle of the inviolability of diplomatic premises.” Sudan’s government has countered these statements by labeling the RSF as a “terrorist, rebel militia” supported by various nations. In Khartoum, eyewitness accounts confirm that significant fighting continues across multiple areas as these hostilities escalate, further complicating the situation in the region.
In the context of ongoing conflict in Sudan, tensions have intensified between the Sudanese army and the RSF. This discord has led to a cycle of blame regarding attacks and support from external entities, particularly the UAE. The UAE has been accused by Sudan’s military of arming the RSF, while the UAE has, in turn, accused Sudan’s army of attacking its diplomatic premises. This recent event demonstrates the fragility of diplomatic relations amid warfare, and highlights the precarious situation for diplomatic personnel in conflict zones.
In summary, the Sudanese army denies involvement in an attack on the UAE ambassador’s residence, attributing responsibility to the RSF. The UAE has condemned the alleged airstrike and called for accountability, while Sudan refutes these claims, declaring them false and aimed at deflecting attention from the RSF’s actions. This incident underscores the escalating violence in Khartoum and raises significant concerns regarding the safety of diplomatic missions within conflict-ridden areas.
Original Source: www.news24.com
