People in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon express skepticism towards the U.S. election candidates, viewing both Trump and Harris as likely to maintain support for Israel. Perspectives shared highlight fears of escalating conflict and the ineffectiveness of American policies. Individuals express hope for peace but remain disillusioned about meaningful change in U.S. foreign policy.
The ongoing U.S. presidential election is eliciting strong opinions in Gaza, the occupied West Bank, and Lebanon regarding its potential outcomes. Many individuals from these areas express deep skepticism towards both candidates, as they perceive systemic biases favoring Israel regardless of the outcome. In Gaza, Ammar Joudeh remarks on the dire consequences of a Trump victory, associating his presidency with increased displacement of Palestinians and worsened living conditions. In contrast, others, like Tahani Arafat, suggest that Biden’s administration has perpetuated violence without substantive intervention. Meanwhile, opinions in the occupied West Bank echo these sentiments, with Khaled Omran stating that a Trump win would lead to more violence for Palestinians, while Wafaa Abdel Rahman highlights the perception of both candidates as equally detrimental. In Lebanon, Joy Slim reflects a complex perspective, indicating that while Trump represents a shift that may reduce U.S. support for Israel, Biden’s administration has also disappointed many who hoped for a more just approach. These voices reflect a broader frustration with American policies in the region and the perception that U.S. foreign policy is unlikely to change regardless of who is elected.
The views gathered from individuals in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon illustrate the deep disenchantment with U.S. foreign policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Amid an escalating conflict and continuous military support for Israel from successive U.S. administrations, many in the region feel marginalized and powerless. The candidacies of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are under scrutiny, with residents speculating on which candidate may influence a more favorable outcome for Palestinians, even as they recognize the limitations of the electoral process.
In summary, the opinions gathered from various individuals in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon reveal a shared sentiment of despair over the future of U.S. policy in the Middle East. Although the upcoming election may have significant implications, many express doubt that either candidate will lead to meaningful support for Palestinian rights or a resolution to ongoing conflicts. The desire for peace and an end to violence prevails, yet many remain skeptical of the electoral process as a viable path to achieving these goals.
Original Source: www.aljazeera.com
